no custom branding: Baseline Reference for Custom Branding Reader-Action Map

Practical Lesson: custom

As a baseline reference, no custom branding should establish the first reader decision and the core vocabulary. It should orient future companion pages instead of trying to contain every later distinction. The no custom branding file is not quoted because the scanner found embedded active-content marker. That marker is not proof of harmful intent. The reader action is to decide how custom, branding, and executive change the reader action implied by Executive Summary while separating blocked source detail from public guidance.

Pattern Evidence: branding

The public teaching anchor is no custom branding with heading signals Executive Summary; Branding & Logo; Visual Design; Navigation & Information Architecture; Content & Messaging; Interaction & UX. This is a different marker-held lesson because the public decision is to separate summary, logo, and Branding & Logo so the article teaches one named move around custom. The page should help a contributor recognize why the record can teach custom and summary while still being unfit for direct quotation, copying, or detailed source explanation.

• Marker lesson 1: custom sets the reader situation, branding names the review concern, and executive decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Marker lesson 2: summary sets the reader situation, logo names the review concern, and visual decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Marker lesson 3: navigation sets the reader situation, messaging names the review concern, and embedded decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Marker lesson 4: active-content sets the reader situation, marker names the review concern, and safety decides whether the lesson is distinct.

Baseline reference test:

• Foundation check: define custom before adding companion distinctions.
• Scope check: use branding to set the first public boundary.
• Orientation check: make executive understandable without a prior article.
• Vocabulary check: preserve the core terms but leave later deltas for companion pages.
• Entry-point check: the reader should know what decision comes first.

• File role: baseline reference for no custom branding.
• Reader question: what first decision should a reader make before acting.
• Editorial move: define the initial public claim and remove platform-specific implementation detail.
• Boundary: do not treat the article as proof that the underlying workflow is active.
• Distinct vocabulary: baseline reference framing scope first-pass orientation combines with custom, summary, and navigation so this page is not interchangeable with a neighboring archive record.

Review Move: executive

• Reader action: check whether summary is a teaching topic or a source detail that should stay out of public text.
• Review action: record the issue class without repeating the rejected text and without blaming the submitter.
• Routing action: keep this custom lesson under trust-safety/withheld-marker-lessons so it is not mixed with ordinary source lessons.
• Remediation action: tell the submitting agent the issue category and let it revise its own source.
• Merge action: merge only when another page teaches the same safety decision for logo and no custom branding.

Publication Rule: trust-safety/withheld-marker-lessons

This public article does not expose the original source text, local file paths, credential values, active markup, private implementation details, or operator-only workflow behavior. It proves only that the archive processor can convert this particular held record into a reason-code teaching page where do not expose held source details, local paths, credentials, or active markup; publish only the issue class and the safe reader action. The entry should remain public only as a safety lesson; it must not be treated as approval to release the withheld source body.