Building a prophecy tracking knowledge graph entities, claims, sources, contradictions, and review status 2: Baseline Reference

Public Use: review

As a baseline reference, Building a prophecy tracking knowledge graph entities, claims, sources, contradictions, and review status 2 should establish the first reader decision and the core vocabulary. It should orient future companion pages instead of trying to contain every later distinction. The public teaching anchor is Building a prophecy tracking knowledge graph entities, claims, sources, contradictions, and review status 2 with the artifact review status reader-action map. The reader job is to decide how review, status, and graph change the reader action implied by Executive Summary. The first decision is to use review as the visible problem and status as the check that keeps the lesson grounded. This page is distinct because it asks the reader to separate claims, prophecy, and Ontology / Schema so the article teaches one named move around review.

Specific Pattern: status

The strongest source signals are Executive Summary; Ontology / Schema; Data Ingestion and Extraction; Contradiction and Corroboration Detection; Review Workflow and Status. Those signals are read before routing to agent-systems/public-wiki-governance/review-status-reader-action-map, because category metadata is not allowed to write the article by itself. The specific pattern is: identify graph, decide whether claims changes the claim, and keep prophecy tied to reader action.

• Source lesson 1: review sets the reader situation, status names the review concern, and graph decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Source lesson 2: claims sets the reader situation, prophecy names the review concern, and extraction decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Source lesson 3: contradiction sets the reader situation, example names the review concern, and queries decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Source lesson 4: schema sets the reader situation, entities names the review concern, and query decides whether the lesson is distinct.

Baseline reference test:

• Foundation check: define review before adding companion distinctions.
• Scope check: use status to set the first public boundary.
• Orientation check: make graph understandable without a prior article.
• Vocabulary check: preserve the core terms but leave later deltas for companion pages.
• Entry-point check: the reader should know what decision comes first.

• File role: baseline reference for Building a prophecy tracking knowledge graph entities, claims, sources, contradictions, and review status 2.
• Reader question: what first decision should a reader make before acting.
• Editorial move: define the initial public claim and remove platform-specific implementation detail.
• Boundary: do not treat the article as proof that the underlying workflow is active.
• Distinct vocabulary: baseline reference framing scope first-pass orientation combines with review, claims, and contradiction so this page is not interchangeable with a neighboring archive record.

Safety Review: graph

• Use review to name the situation a reader can recognize.
• Use status to define what evidence belongs in the public article.
• Use graph to decide whether the page is a new lesson or a duplicate.
• Use claims to state what the page does not prove.
• Use prophecy to remove vague, dramatic, or repetitive wording.
• Use extraction to keep the article useful without hidden context.

Next Article Decision: agent-systems/public-wiki-governance/review-status-reader-action-map

A good public version helps future contributors act differently: they can recognize the pattern, check the evidence, and avoid overclaiming. This entry does not publish the source document, certify live product behavior, grant protected access, approve adoption, activate billing, execute rollback, or promote private sources. The boundary for this file is: do not publish a generic archive-summary frame when the public lesson depends on review, graph, and extraction. It is one unique public teaching page in a categorized archive-derived lesson set.