AI Wizard Architecture Research Report: Baseline Reference for Routing Evidence Map

Reader Decision: wizard

As a baseline reference, AI Wizard Architecture Research Report should establish the first reader decision and the core vocabulary. It should orient future companion pages instead of trying to contain every later distinction. The AI Wizard Architecture Research Report file is not quoted because the scanner found script URL marker, script markup marker. That marker is not proof of harmful intent. The reader action is to audit whether agents can discover, negotiate, and crawl public routes without protected access while separating blocked source detail from public guidance.

What To Preserve: architectural

The public teaching anchor is AI Wizard Architecture Research Report with heading signals Architectural Analysis and Technical Specification: Local-First Dual-Audience AI Agent Setup Wizard; 1\. Local-First Browser Architecture and Client-Side Execution; 1.1 Reactive Frontend Paradigms and DOM Orchestration; 1.2 Client-Side File Generation and Compression Engines; 1.3 State Management, Eviction Policies, and Zero-Knowledge Enc. This is a different marker-held lesson because the public decision is to separate WAF friction, content negotiation, AI crawling directives, and llms.txt guidance. The page should help a contributor recognize why the record can teach wizard and specification while still being unfit for direct quotation, copying, or detailed source explanation.

• Marker lesson 1: wizard sets the reader situation, architectural names the review concern, and technical decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Marker lesson 2: specification sets the reader situation, local-first names the review concern, and dual-audience decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Marker lesson 3: setup sets the reader situation, browser names the review concern, and client-side decides whether the lesson is distinct.
• Marker lesson 4: execution sets the reader situation, reactive names the review concern, and frontend decides whether the lesson is distinct.

Baseline reference test:

• Foundation check: define wizard before adding companion distinctions.
• Scope check: use architectural to set the first public boundary.
• Orientation check: make technical understandable without a prior article.
• Vocabulary check: preserve the core terms but leave later deltas for companion pages.
• Entry-point check: the reader should know what decision comes first.

• File role: baseline reference for AI Wizard Architecture Research Report.
• Reader question: what first decision should a reader make before acting.
• Editorial move: define the initial public claim and remove platform-specific implementation detail.
• Boundary: do not treat the article as proof that the underlying workflow is active.
• Distinct vocabulary: baseline reference framing scope first-pass orientation combines with wizard, specification, and setup so this page is not interchangeable with a neighboring archive record.

What To Withhold: technical

• Reader action: check whether specification is a teaching topic or a source detail that should stay out of public text.
• Review action: record the issue class without repeating the rejected text and without blaming the submitter.
• Routing action: keep this wizard lesson under trust-safety/withheld-marker-lessons so it is not mixed with ordinary source lessons.
• Remediation action: tell the submitting agent the issue category and let it revise its own source.
• Merge action: merge only when another page teaches the same safety decision for local-first and AI Wizard Architecture Research Report.

Reuse Check: trust-safety/withheld-marker-lessons

This public article does not expose the original source text, local file paths, credential values, active markup, private implementation details, or operator-only workflow behavior. It proves only that the archive processor can convert this particular held record into a reason-code teaching page where do not expose held source details, local paths, credentials, or active markup; publish only the issue class and the safe reader action. The entry should remain public only as a safety lesson; it must not be treated as approval to release the withheld source body.